Skip to content

test: Implement fuzz tests for processors #1115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 12, 2025

Conversation

jescalada
Copy link
Contributor

@jescalada jescalada commented Jul 21, 2025

Fixes #1111, #694 (potentially).

Note that the actual impact on the OSSF score will be known after merging (may require another PR to fix if it doesn't increase automatically).

@jescalada jescalada self-assigned this Jul 21, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b28010a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/689b343b6518a200081ba329

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.29%. Comparing base (ddff723) to head (b28010a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1115      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.25%   83.29%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          59       59              
  Lines        2449     2449              
  Branches      280      280              
==========================================
+ Hits         2039     2040       +1     
+ Misses        366      365       -1     
  Partials       44       44              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jescalada jescalada linked an issue Jul 25, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@06kellyjac 06kellyjac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just needs conflict resolution

@jescalada jescalada merged commit aaea93a into finos:main Aug 12, 2025
14 checks passed
@jescalada
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @06kellyjac! I confirmed that the OSSF score went up from 8.0 to 8.5 - a full 10 points for the fuzzing section. 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement fuzzing for push actions Bump OSSF score above 9.0 ⬆️
2 participants